Why I voted “No!” with my Twitter proxy vote…

San Francisco CA

Description

I believe there are multiple long-standing “adverse material effects” regarding Twitter’s operations, including an excessive number of “robot” accounts, and an inexcusable failure to secure “informational accounts” which would bring undeniably-truths to the “digital town square” (due to an inherent “preponderance of evidence” to these truths on said informational accounts”). I believe both of these “adverse material effects” have GREATLY reduced Twitter’s (base) share price), Therefore, I asked the following question. “Why hasn’t Twitter, at any time over the last ten (10) years, secured any of CA’s (yearly) fifty eight (58) county-based civil grand juries as informational sources on their platform thereby GREATLY increased platform viewership, followers, and critical ad revenues?” Suspiciously I ask such, as it’s not out-of-the-question that such a shocking oversight could’ve been a result of “pre-meditated conspiratorial censorship” between CA (county, state, and federal) public office holders and Twitter executives in order to limit the “people’s right to know what their government is up to” considering a written “Accusation” (i.e. accusatory indictment) from a CA County Civil Grand Jury can, expeditiously, result in the “removal from office” (per CA Government Codes 3060 - 3075) of public officers engaged in “willful or corrupt misconduct” while in office (per Penal Code 919(c)).