re: ho w to piss off a DemoKKKrat

Fairfax CA

Description

Bitter? Angry? Ha Ha you have me mistaken for a Dumper. Like YOU! I live in a place where the weather is the best. If I want to see snow, I can drive to it. I get sunshine 300 days a year. Temps generally hover ~75 degrees. How's it where you are? On lying, show me what I've lied about. The only thing I've ever posted that I knew wasn't true was about Dump's salary. Other than that, it's all true and verifiable. Oh and Dump's salary was a pittance compared the money he took elsewhere. So no, he wasn't doing anything magnanimous. It was all for show. On "my" charges, sorry but they aren't mine. These are the charges the DOJ are weighing. What's it gonna be like when several dozen Dumpers are thrown out of Congress? Never to run again! I wonder how many of those seats will turn? And yes I'm sure you're butt hurt because your god was a stupid god. A narcissistic god. A lying god. Lastly, I'm a liberal not a Democrat. Unlike you I am an American whose loyalty is to America. Not a political party like you. And YOUR political party seems to have more than its share of idiots, liars, fear-mongers, and condescending assholes who think they're better than others. Some people are going to jail and it isn't Joe Biden. Oh and go have a conversation with some of the people arrested for Jan 6th. Ask them how they feel about Dump. I am sure they're still feeling the love. re: ho w to piss off a DemoKKKrat (fairfax) (bernal heights) © craigslist - Map data © OpenStreetMap FACT - All your charges against Trump haven't been proven in a court of law they are as usual strictly Democrat allegations. Since there were several states, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin who's election laws were illegally changed just before the 2020 election Trump had every right to challenge mail in ballots being counted. There's no law that says a candidate can't ask states to invalidate illegal votes. None of the SC justices ever state their opinions on potential lawsuits or cases that would show prejudice, being asked about prior SC precedents are theoretical questions because the facts are more than 300 SC precedents have been overturned in our history. When a known liar and exaggerated like you makes statements they should all be questioned, you're a bitter and angry Democrat who always allows your emotions to overrule logic.