ReReRe: Guns

New Ipswich NH

Description

I did see that you mentioned AR-15s and AK-47s, but it didn't matter. You failed to figure out that the reason for owning the gun is immaterial. The right to keep and bear arms exists in the Constitution and there need be no further explanation as to why someone feels the need to own one or what they want it for. The left wants to demand a justification for guns for hunting or self-defense or whatever. But the 2nd Amendment does not require any justification. You have the right to keep and bear arms... no restrictions on what type or magazine capacity. It is just like the 1st Amendment which does not require you to justify WHY you should have the right to express your opinion. You have the right... period. Should we demand an equal sort of justification about what you're saying and why? You're voicing your views even though you are in no official capacity no teaching capacity. You are just exercising your right. Like the owner's choice to have a 30-round magazine, you're allowed to speak only because you have that right. Other than simply having the right, why should you be allowed to speak if it serves no real or meaningful purpose? The guns that you mentioned are semi-automatic long rifles. They are no different than any other semi-automatic long rifle other than they look like military weapons. Again, the 2nd Amendment does not restrict the type of weapons or magazines or how scary they make you feel.