Description
Defending is one thing. Defending your version with violence is another. And there lies the problem. You can't tell the difference.
Some people should have weapons. Some should not.
You think most should. Because if everyone is armed. Soon there won't be any troublemakers.
That makes everyone judge jury and executioner. By those standards. I see a lot of your people are violent and we should shoot them.
Where do you draw the line? That it's where you see it. Regardless of where others see it.
That it's ok for you to decide when to shoot. But we can't see you as a danger and shoot you?
Or at least keep some of you from having guns?
When you have civilization and a lot of people living together. There has to be some controll over anything that could endanger people. Especially something that can kill en masse.
And doubly so when you have people who can't tell the difference between deffence and defending their version of something. The most dangerous kind of people on earth.
Don't get me wrong. I believe in guns. I just don't believe you should have any. Or at least not an assault rifle. It should be kept at safe place. Then brought to you. When you'd like to fire it.
Of course you won't feel safe because the bad guys will have assault rifles.
That's why they need to be brought under controll. To a point anyway. How many people do you see dying from Tommy guns anymore? Or uzis in America? It's not because we don't have them. It's because we took them away from the idiots. That see themselves as right and no one else.
Discussion
By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.