Description
MILFORD, MA — President Donald Trump's loss in Massachusetts on Tuesday was expected, but was it worse than his loss in 2016?
With almost 100 percent of precincts reporting on Wednesday afternoon, Joe Biden was beating Trump 66 to 32.5 percent statewide. In 2016, Hillary Clinton earned 60 percent of the vote to Trump's 33 percent.
So how did Trump's support in Milford compare with his vote totals in 2016? It was virtually unchanged. Trump got a few more votes in 2020, but his share of the vote didn't really move. Biden, however, improved by six points over Clinton.
2020 Joe Biden/Kamala Harris — 8,472, 59.2 percentDonald Trump/Mike Pence — 5,410, 37.8 percentVotes cast: 14,299, 76.4 percent turnout 2016 Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine — 7,325, 53.1 percentDonald Trump/Mike Pence — 5,231, 37.9 percentVotes cast: 13,771, 76.1 percent turnout The difference wasn't so stark in all parts of Worcester County.
In Barre, Biden squeaked out a win with 48.69 percent of the vote, beating Trump by just four votes. Biden's lead was only 12 votes in Hardwick — and one vote in Sutton and Webster.
Meanwhile, Trump won in Hubbardston, Millville, Templeton, Spencer, Leicester, Douglas, Dudley, Charlton, New Braintree, Oakham and Oxford.
Trump had struggled to overcome polling deficits in key states in the campaign's final days. He ran strong as expected in rural areas, but lost support among other critical voting groups, including suburban women in several battleground states.
CNN reported in October that polling put Biden up by 25 points among women voters. According to the final 2016 pre-election polls, Clinton won women voters by 13 points among likely voters and 14 points among registered voters.
Discussion
By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.