And yet another reply from email

Allenport PA

Description

Well, it seems that our first FASCIST want-to-be DICTATOR responded to my post about their fellow Fascist (or could these two just be DIFFERENT personalities of the same DELUSIONAL FASCIST?) So once again since he/she/it cannot seem to be capable of actually posting to the board (it's not that difficult just hit the post button, in the top right corner.) Oh, I see the problem he/she/it stays as far away from anything right as possible. Which may help explain their latest Diatribe. So, without further ado I give (UNCUT, and in it's FULL GLORIOUS LUNACY) their latest missive. "You seem to be in need of an update on your basic information. As most of your kind do. Here are a few reading suggestions. 1 A dictionary from England 2 US HISTORY 3 General Science 4 Anthropology/Human Anatomy 5 A plain language NEW TESTAMENT. PS A little advice for your connie COM(R)ADES. Lose some weight and your manhoods would not seem so CONSERVATIVE. Like your leader Baby Bella. Stormy knows." Yup, once again that's the entire email. Shows you the lack of intelligence that I am being forced to deal with, but at least this PERSONALITY seems to know how to use the Shift key. Bravo, you have mastered 1st grade English. Who knows tomorrow you may even be allowed to dress yourself. Well, we can hope anyway. But on to the dissection: What exactly do I need to "update" of my basic information? Funny, these pointless claims, without even a clue as to how they should be interrupted. But then as he/she/it/they spew forth: with some reading suggestions: "1 A dictionary from England" Hmmm, I always thought that Miriam Webster was the default English dictionary here in America. In fact Merriam-Webster, Inc., is an American company that publishes reference books and is especially known for its dictionaries. In 1828, George and Charles Merriam founded the company as G & C Merriam Co. in Springfield, Massachusetts. Oh, wait I see silly me living in the United States, posting on a board dedicated to PTTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USA, EARTH, and here I am using the Dictionary of the company that has only been publishing Dictionaries here in America since 1828. Silly me, I should be using the OXFORD (that's in ENGLAND, don't cha know?) English Dictionary because??? But wait let's see what that dictionary says: "From the second edition (1989): Fascism (ˈfæʃɪz(ə)m, occas. ˈfæsɪz(ə)m) Also in It. form Fascismo (faʃˈʃizmo), and with small initial. [ad. It. fascismo, f. fascio bundle, group: see Fasci and -ism.] The principles and organization of Fascists. Also, loosely, any form of right-wing authoritarianism. (Link: https://www.oed.com/oed2/00082523?msclkid=c793cf1abc2e11eca8bad1d05f420d1f) Well that sure does put a different spin on things. It eliminates almost the entire definition in favor of "The principles and organization of Fascists." Now the funny part is that this OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY doesn't spell out what those "PRINCIPLES and ORGANIZATION" consist of. Instead it says "Also, loosely, any form of right-wing authoritarianism." Hmm, does it DEFINE that "LOOSELY" I guess if you are looking at it from the viewpoint of Stalin, Mao, or even Fidel Castro yes you might "LOOSELY" call it RIGHT WING. Now let's compare that to the definition I already posted: ""fas·​cism | \ ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi- \ Definition of fascism 1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition 2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality" Straight from the Mariam Webster Dictionary (LINK:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism?msclkid=a1227a01bc0d11ec9358d29b4c74275b) Why wait a second the Definition I previously posted does away with the all the ambiguity, that our little FASCIST wants to rely on. It actually defines (sort of a good thing for a Dictionary to do) the "The principles and organization of Fascists". Gee, it's almost as if they wanted you to be able to spot actual FASCISTS based on their actions. Imagine that. Instead of relying on "Also, loosely, any form of right-wing authoritarianism." But hey, when you want to obscure the truth no better way than to use "LOOSELY" defined terms. But moving on we are given " "2 US HISTORY" Oh you mean like how the REPUBLICAN party was formed to counter the DEMOCRATS trying to Justify Slavery? Or perhaps you mean how " the actual voting record for both Houses of Congress shows that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed the Senate on a 73-to-27 vote. The Democratic supermajority in the Senate split their vote 46 (69%) for and 21 (31%) against. The Republicans, on the other hand, split their vote 27 for (82%) and 6 against (18%). Thus, the no vote consisted of 78% Democrats. Further, the infamous 74-day filibuster was led by the Southern Democrats, who overwhelmingly voted against the act." In fact in the HOUSE An examination of the House vote shows a similar pattern. The House voted 290 to 130 in favor. Democrats split their vote 152 (61%) to 96 (39%) while Republicans split theirs 138 (80%) to 34 (20%). The no vote consisted of 74% Democrats. Clearly, the 1964 Civil Rights Act could not have been passed without the leadership of Republicans such as Everett Dirksen and the votes of Republicans. " Yup, it's an actual fact, of course our little Fascist will claim without proof it's a lie. (LINK: https://oliverwillis.com/who-passed-the-civil-rights-act/?msclkid=7eabc986bc3111ecb7933e14a9e99e29) Damn there I go with facts again. "3 General Science" - Where this one is coming from who knows. I assume that our little want-to-be DICTATOR is making some kind of reference to the false claims that Republicans are anti-science. But then claims that GENETICS have no point in science (Yes, Virginia there are in fact only two sexes (Male, and Female) anything else is made up hogwash, or to put it another way is "LOOSELY" defined. "4 Anthropology/Human Anatomy" - Again please see the comment on Science. Lastly, we get "5 A plain language NEW TESTAMENT." Which plain language "NEW TESTIMENT would you like me to read? The King JAMES Version? Or Perhaps the "RECOVERY" version? Or Perhaps the "NEW INTERNATIONAL" version? Some advice would be helpful, as I am an ATHEIST. Yup sorry, to point out the FACT that I don't believe in either a god, nor a devil, nor a heaven, nor a hell. Yup, all fables to try to teach MORALS to a primitive people. They all basically say "Do what I tell you or BIG, BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN TO YOU, If not IMMEDIATELY, then for all eternity after you die." Yup, sorry to break it to you but it's all a crutch needed by weak minded fools. Damn, there I go with facts, yet again. How can I ever expect our little Fascists to combat FACTS.