To the "Defamation" genius

Albany NY

Description

Dear Clarence Thomas: Actually: NO. That's not how it works Civil action: hey anyone can sue anyone over anything. I can sue you for frauduently acting like you know what the hell you are talking about. But I likely won't succeed. Nether would any such action related to the wacko on here. To actually succeed in such an effort, please learn: Defamation has certain tests that must be passed. # 1 is that the statement must be false. It goes without saying this would be a near-impossible mountain to climb here in this matter, given the nutjob's long history of having published hundreds of unhinged rants exposing his far right ideology. Bring in the political scientists to argue this point. I can predict the consensus. Next; even if he SOMEHOW passes the above test, he next has to prove that the OP actually KNOWS the claim is false. This would be even harder to do; especially after that examination as per above and the opinions that would accrue from those various experts. Hey, if the experts say it is true, you're next going to claim that the OP must have known it is false? uhhhhh-huh! By some 1 in a million chance he is still moving forward, the next test is to establish actual real and direct $$ damages. Did he lose a specific sound guy job as a direct result of this? OK, let's hear about it. Again, good luck on that math. Fact: you're FoS there, obviously On to Craiglist, then: - Yes, CList has a right as a private enterprise to kick the OP off their site, for a term or for good. For whatever reason they so desire. That is legit. Their call. That's the way it is and should be. All for it. - But your claim of their being required to automatically FWD any info based on a simple request from the offended / butt-hurt individual (the Victim) is BS. As in: a straight out lie. - Do your homework ..Because you're acting even crazier than the troubled Sound Boy here. But congrats on the Law School GED. I didn't know they existed. Devry? -