RE: wikipedia vs breitbart, oan, fox- You Decide

Buffalo NY

Description

I only quote wackopedia themselves where they admit that their information is not based upon truth, but what someone who published the lie believes to be the truth. That is the only verifying they do. In other words, they think like democrats: "Its muzza be twoo cuz sumwon sed suh." I only quote wackopedia themselves. Now you like to claim other sources are unreliable "Cuz eye sed suh" without showing any proof. I have provided proof that fools use a foolish source that admits to not including truth, just "what someone believes to be truth". That is a direct quote and here is the link to verify my claim. The only verification required by wackopedia is "Cuz sumwon sed suh". Where is your proof to back your cult claims? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability,_not_truth