Re Re Fox News/Hunter's Laptop

News

West Alton MO

Description

That proved literally nothing on your point. People saw the things Trump had done and saw the things Biden had done and decided on the lesser of two evils. Both candidates weren't good people. But one of them was bad in enough ways, such as political stances and financial issues and racism/sexism and s*xual *ssault etc (both political and judges of character), and consistently bad in those ways, that people wanted him out of office badly enough to get him out any means necessary. You think the left side's investigations are invalid for turning up no results, what about the investigations on the right that turned up nothing? Are both stupid for investigating? Are both smart for investigating? If the result is the same, why does it matter and what are the differences? As for bringing up racism for the sake of "justice", I'm not really sure what it has to do with corruption. Yes it is a political issue in many ways and is also a judge of character but as far as I've seen that had nothing to do with voter fraud or overseas deals, unless you want to talk about things like red lining or xenophobia or something like that, which is a separate issue. People being opposed to a racist is a judge of character matter, and that had to be done on both candidates. If Trump Jr's laptop had the same things on it, I don't think it would have been brought up at random points during debates between the two candidates, and it would have been looked into just the same as this is being handled now. My current feelings about either side would be entirely unchanged because this doesn't tell me anything I didn't already suspect about them based on other evidence. You don't know what side I stand on, you don't know who I voted for. All I said was that you should stop personally attacking people you're responding to on Craigslist because you feel a certain way. I'm not opposed to a divide, I literally gave you both tips on how to improve your posts, left and right. I'm not sure if you understand that I am a third party interjecting, but I would like to once again state that.

By:  view source

Discussion

By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

/
Search this area