Kamala's aide attempts to stop interview by 'FAKING' technical issues

News

Columbus OH

Description

Kamala's aide attempts to stop interview by 'FAKING' technical issues Vice President Kamala Harris's outgoing aide Symone Sanders tried to cut off an interview with radio host Charlamagne. He had asked Harris on his show why she and President Joe Biden were unable to pass their $1.75 trillion Build Back Better legislation. His question so angered Harris that her aide, Sanders, could be heard off-camera on the other end of the remote interview, shouting, " I'm sorry but we have to wrap. I'm sorry to interrupt.' 'They're acting like they can't hear me, yo,' Charlamagne says, turning to a producer off-camera, implying that Harris's team was faking technical issues... Harris, looking angry and tense, stared at Charlamagne and replied, 'I can hear you,' allowing Charlamagne to finally continue with his question. 'So who's the real president of this country? 'Come on, Charlamagne,' Harris says. 'Come on. It's Joe Biden.' Charlamagne replies: 'I can't tell sometimes.' Harris, growing visibly angry, wags her finger at the host and says: 'No, no, no, no, no, no, no. It's Joe Biden, and don't start talking like a Republican about asking whether or not he's president. And it's Joe Biden. And I'm vice president and my name is Kamala Harris Business Insider Insider recently found that 52 members of congress and 182 senior staffers have violated the STOCK Act. Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez pushed back against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's rejection of a ban on members of Congress from trading and holding individual stock while in office. There is no reason members of Congress should hold and trade individual stock when we write major policy and have access to sensitive information. There are many ways members can invest w/o creating actual or appeared conflict of interest, like thrift savings plans or index funds Retiring Boomers, not lazy Millennials, are driving the labor shortage, young people didn't want to work because they were getting by just fine on government aid. People had too much money, went the narrative from a handful of politicians and pundits.

By:  view source

Discussion

By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

/
Search this area