Re Artificial right wingtard intellligence

Charlestown IN

Description

You are stupid beyond words. I write on CL for style of ease, not academic judgement. Certainly not to impress some low-brow commie like yourself. Which by the way you are so pathetic. Somehow your twisted mind equates never hearing of a major publication, never giving sources, not being able to read with even a moderate level of understanding proof you are intelligent. Guess what? it does the exact opposite. Furthermore your writing is heavy with platitudes, as an example here is one: “ They didn't know which end of a broom,mop,shovel,hammer or screw driver to hold or how to use it (like my brother-in-law).”. Whatever, liar. You’ve never known one individual (other than a baby or an imbecile) in your life that didn’t understand the difference in the handle or straw end of a broom. Just meaningless declarative statements. Here is another “… degree you claim to have, its just a piece of paper to hang on your refrigerator..”. Ohhh, I get it it. Since YOU don’t have a degree that makes you more intelligent more resourceful because you learned everything from the “school of hard knocks” or some other platitude. Well if a Degree is nothing more than a piece of paper why do 4/10 undergraduates STILL drop out for academic reasons, even though standards have certainly lessened? Finally let’s talk specifics because I think that’s going to clearly show what a reactionary-radical left wing-Buffon you are. I posted a legitimate article (https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/covid-could-man-made-virus-22473714 ), from a legitimate Publication (The Daily Telegraph), that listed the Author (Channon), the scientist who presented the findings to Parliament (Dr Alina Chan) and where he went to College (Harvard). After seeing my post here is what (shit) you spouted out of your mouth: ‘Which news source is this from”—Idiot The Daily Telegraph, that’s what the link showed “Who researched this?——-Well dummy my wildest guess would be…hmmmm. Maybe, just maybe the Author, Channon? “what was their sources”—Obvious as it was presented to the British House of Parliament its public record. “who?”—-Gibberish, doesn’t even make sense. “ Top scientist?Which one?Who it this scientist?”—-More gibberish from the dumbass. the ARTICLE says DR ALINA CHAN. Now we’ve settled the undeniable fact you are not bright let’s look at my claim you are a reactionary, radical leftist: "Another MAGA/ANTI VACCERCOVID”— Wow, besides showing you didn’t even open the link, it’s shows the depths of your aggression and lack of thought. Scream first then ask question is your “modus operandi”. 1. It had no political content, so how was it MAGA? 2. It said nothing on vaccines, and I’ve had two 3. More gibberish from you, I don’t even know what “COVID” refers to. I’m out of this conversation, As I argue with you I can feel my IQ slightly dropping. Reminds me of the old quote by Mark Twain. (Refer to the meme Dork)