Re: Re: "Conspiracies"

Troy MI

Description

Do you know the definition of objectivity? It does not mean you report anyone who posts something that you don't agree with so that their post will be deleted. So please stop reporting me. It does not mean only reading sources that agree with the narrative. If you don't know what I'm talking about, you could follow the career of Bari Weiss or any number of others. No. I asked you to use your eyes, ears and common sense. Here is an example: The left say the green new deal is about the environment. That is what Biden, Harris and Kerry say. Yet they shut down the keystone pipeline. Instead of using the pipeline, that oil is being put on trucks or trains or it's being put on ships going west. Either way it pollutes more, emits more greenhouse gases, and there is a greater risk of spills. The safest way to transport that oil with the lowest emissions is the pipeline. The Biden administration is now urging OPEC to produce more oil - Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran... the oil and gas that they produce is dirtier and pollutes more. Last year the U.S. had the greatest CO2 reduction of any nation. Natural gas reduces pollution and greenhouse gases and yet the Biden administration doesn't want it. China is the greatest polluter but they aren't held to any standards. Headed to the climate conference something like over 400 officials flew in private jets which produce more global warming gas than most Americans ever will. The policies of the current administration has increased pollution and greenhouse gases but I bet you still believe the current administration is for the environment because that is what they said. Right? Those links WERE from multiple points of view. You weren't specific about which "conspiracy" you were referring to so I had to address multiple although a far cry from all the stories legacy media has lied about, spun or buried. Do you actually believe the border, covid origins, immunity to covid, the bill that he is trying to pass, the election, Afghanistan, etc. are all conspiracies? Any time someone says something that doesn't fit the narrative, they just cry "conspiracy" and it's effective 1. An interview with the former head of border patrol - recently retired ex Biden official (who is nonpartisan and would not talk politics by the way) 2. An interview with the former speaker of the house 3. A documentary on what really happened in Wuhan, the origin of Covid 4. Some drug facts from various sources including the U.S. Sentencing Commission Report, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the DEA, the CDC, etc. 5. First, shows a double standard between the burden of proof needed for legacy media vs everyone they shut down. One that I would not have believed if I had not seen it: "I am a journalist and a reporter and I follow the facts and there has never been any issues in terms of corruption," says the CNN reporter. Follow-up "How do you know that?" And then the slip up. The CNN reporter admits they are not going to dig into the stories that they are fed and they will not verify that it is fact before they report it. Then, interview with Ben Schreckinger from Politico (not conservative and the 1st one to run that fake news story claiming that it was russian disinformation) on his new book 6. and 7. They simply show video of things that was said on the senate floor - makes it hard to rewrite the narrative 8. Conservative point of view? Really? If I am going to be lied to, I want to be lied to to my face. Also, a lot of communication is non verbal - so pardon people's use of video. Also, I wouldn't believe a lot of what is happening if I hadn't seen evidence of it. If you prefer to read, then do it! Actually dig into it and check the sources because just reading articles from legacy media who won't print anything that doesn't agree with the narrative makes you a "sheeple" as you put it. Please stop deleting my posts and I will shut up but you can't simply delete me