Description
A law professor and ethics expert says the nature of Hunter Biden's art sales are "whacko."
"It's bizarre that that's the solution that they came upon," Kathleen Clark told Politico.
Experts are criticizing the gallery and White House's attempts to insulate the art sales from undue influence.
White House officials came to an unprecedented agreement with the New York City gallery housing Hunter's art that allows President Joe Biden's eldest son, to earn a living from his art while, in theory, not knowing who buys his paintings. The arrangement is an effort to offset concerns about a conflict of interest posed by powerful people who might want to exert influence over the White House through his son's art.
But government ethics and legal experts like Clark, an expert in government ethics, are crying foul, compounding the scrutiny Hunter has faced over his business dealings during his father's 2020 campaign and presidency.
"It leaves, frankly, the Biden administration wide open to concerns that people are going to buy influence by buying Hunter Biden's paintings at what might be inflated prices," Clark told Politico "The idea of keeping the identity of the buyers secret or the price secret is no way to protect the public interest or ensure public confidence that there isn't corruption going on. It's bizarre that that's the solution that they came upon."
At a recent showing his art at Milk Studios in Los Angeles, where he lives, Hunter mingled with potential buyers and wealthy power players including Mayor Eric Garcetti, who is Biden's nominee for US Ambassador to India, and former Stockton, California mayor Michael Tubbs, singer Moby, and boxer Sugar Ray Leonard, CNN reported.
WHAT A CROCK BUT THE LIBERALS WILL BELIVE THIS BECAUSE CNN WILL TELL THEM TO
Discussion
By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.