Description
The Dakota pipeline was designed to transport extremely low grade (barely refinable oil) across the nation from the tar sands oil pit in Alberta Canada to the Midwest. Why? Why would anyone ever want to build this? Why would the oil companies not build a refinery near the oil source instead? Building and maintaining this pipeline is more costly than building a refinery at tar sands. So why build the pipeline? Who was behind this construction and why?
I will let you do your own pondering and research on this one, but I will offer a clue. The pipeline construction has very little to do with delivering oil from one place to another.
Could this oil pipeline have something to do with taking land from farmers through a proves called eminent domain? What value could these millions of acres hold? Would ranchers and land owners ever sell this land willingly? What other resources could be harvested in this mostly desolate region of North America? Wind? Minerals? What geographic value does ti stand have to anyone (oil companies). Precious metals? Lithium? Cadmium? Phosphorus?
It makes no sense to build a pipe to transport nearly worthless oil when. we have more clean oil resources than we will ever use. It makes no sense to build this pipeline. But it is a clever way of "acquiring" land without a land owners consent. Why were the Koch Brothers funding this project? Who is the remaining Koch brother and why was he and his deceased brother so intent on making this project happen? What is the primary business of the koch brothers?
Before you blindly support a cause based on the recommendations of political leaders, you should dig for the fundamental truths of that cause first.
Discussion
By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.