Re: Explain This

Albuquerque NM

Description

I'm assuming you are genuinely interested and willing to look at what I have to say objectively, even though your post has hints that you will not. Ivermectin is and has been used for treating humans for 40+ years and has a historical safety record. There are numerous studies at this point showing that it is effective in treating the virus, if you're truly interested then you can view 63 of them (44 peer reviewed) here - https://ivmmeta.com/ Ivermectin is past its patent so it is cheap to make which means there is no money to be made like there is with these injections, which is why you aren't seeing huge studies being conducted by major pharmaceutical companies. There is evidence that the virus is not a respiratory disease but functions similar to malaria, which Ivermectin is used to treat, in that it rips hemoglobin from blood cells which leads to the problems we see with people unable to breathe - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267810/ In terms of why I'm not interested in taking this injection I am a younger, fit individual who does not have any comorbidities that will endanger my life from this virus. With robust proof of effective treatments it is safer for me to risk exposure to the virus and develop natural immunity that it is to take an injection of a vaccine, which does not prevent getting or spreading the virus, only reduces symptoms allowing the person to act as a superspreader. There is intentional gaslighting happening with the safety profile of these shots. Based on a conservative statistical analysis I am 7x more likely (.0035%) to have an adverse reaction to the injection than I am to die from the virus (.0005). The following is an analysis of the VAERS information showing these injections are responsible for more deaths and injuries in the last 8 months than all vaccines combined over the past 30 years - https://vaersanalysis.info/