#This Is What Republicans Believe in
News
San Francisco CA
Description
It was a debate among Christians about whether the Indians of the Americas were human. Yeah, the Love of Jesus People you: Invented Genocide, Gave it to Hitler to solve the Jewish Problem, as America Solved the Indian Problem. Yes, Christians were the First Nazis, and George Washington was the First Hitler. The Doctrine of Discovery was among Christians mandates dating back to the 15th century, called papal bulls, that declared Christian monarchs had the right to claim superior title over land and territories that they "discovered." The claimed right of "dominion" over Native peoples was based on the thinking that non-Christians were "heathens and uncivilized savages," with no, or limited rights, to land. The Vatican's Doctrine of Discovery was based on the premise that all non-Christian land belonged to no one because no Christians were living there and no Christian monarch or lord had yet claimed dominion. Once Christian monarchies like Spain or France claimed the right of dominion, that claim was transferred to political successors over centuries. "Indian land rights have been characterized in U.S. law as nothing more than a permissive right of occupancy or permission from the whites to occupy their own Indian lands," Frichner said. There were theologians who did not agree that Christian discovery could give dominion over and title to non-Christian lands. The issue was debated at length in the early 1550s in Spain with no input from indigenous peoples, she said. It was a debate among Christian Europeans about whether the Indians of the Americas were human. This is what Christians Power Is. "The first thing indigenous peoples share is the experience of having been invaded by those who treated us without compassion because they considered us to be less than human," said Frichner, a citizen of the Onondaga Nation serving her first term on the 16-member UNPFII. "Dehumanization leads to the second thing indigenous peoples share in common: Being treated on the basis of the belief that those who invaded our territories have a right of lordship or dominance over our existence and, therefore, have the right to take, grant, and dispose of our lands, territories, and resources without our permission or consent." Frichner said human rights violations faced by indigenous peoples can all be traced to the Doctrine of Discovery and its interpretive framework which has been used for five centuries to take Native lands. Your post shows total ignorance and stupidity, reality is Genocidal Removal 100 Million humans for Useless Savages are subhumans which is A Crime against Humanity, Adolpf Hitler followed Americas to create the Holocaust, Ayn Rand supports Genocide! This Is What Republicans Believe: Let's suppose they were all beautifully innocent savages, which they certainly were not," Rand persisted. "What was it that they were fighting for, if they opposed white men on this continent? For their wish to continue a primitive existence, their right to keep part of the earth untouched, unused, and not even as property, but just keep everybody out so that you will live practically like an animal?" she asked. "Any white person who brings the elements of civilization had the right to take over this continent," Rand said, "and it is great that some people did, and discovered here what they couldn't do anywhere else in the world and what the Indians, if there are any racist Indians today, do not believe to this day: respect for individual rights."
Discussion
By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.