The Science of Blood Clots at High Altitudes

Eureka CA

Description

Turns out, the mRNA-based experimental vaccines we have been compelled to accept, cause blood clots. Turns out, blood cells clot together more easily at higher altitudes. This is well known, see https://duckduckgo.com/?q=high+altitude+blood+clotting for a variety of studies of mountain climbers and pilots that predate COVID-19 by decades. Four British Airways pilots are said to have died recently, more or less after receiving The Vaccine. We can argue until the cows come home about whether they did or did not die, whether they did or did not possess comorbidities that might explain their deaths, and whether the deaths are or are not related to the vaccine. However, it does not matter, because the science is very clear on blood clotting and altitude. It's probably been known since World War II, when humans first acquired large amounts of experience with bleeding at high altitudes. I'd like to take a moment to clear up some misunderstandings about just exactly what Science *is*. Science is not results. Science is process. It is how you ACHIEVE those results that makes it science. Science is about the ability to reproduce results. If I can read your article about how you made something happen, and I can follow your instructions, and I can achieve the same result, and I can prove that it is identical to the result that you achieved, then I have just objectively verified the truth of the information that you shared and so the information may be shared with greater confidence, because it has been verified, using the scientific method. Betty Crocker's Cookbook is science in action. Every time you follow those instructions correctly, you are repeating someone's successful experiment. Predictable food preparation and quality control is based almost entirely on science. You don't need to be a "scientist" to use the scientific method. If you and your friend go shopping together and you both buy the same brand of baking soda, and your friend goes home, tries to bake something, finds that the dough doesn't rise, and develops a theory - that the baking soda is bad - calls you up, shares her theory with you, and you test her theory by following the same recipe, with the same baking soda, and get the same results... that is science, in action. If your friend at school says that she read that you can make a wart go away by cutting a potato in half and binding the raw potato against the wart, then reciting magic words while rotating clockwise, during the full moon, and tries it, and her wart goes away, and you have a wart, and you try the same thing, and it doesn't work... is that science? I say, yes, it is - not very good science, but it's a start. A better experiment would be to split one potato and put it onto two different peoples' warts, to see if the cause of the hypothetical wart disappearance is caused, perhaps, by the kind of potato you use, or if the phase of the moon really works. You'll need a large supply of people with warts. But each wart is different. Your efforts at applying scientific method may encounter problems. Scientific method cannot solve every problem. But it can help describe the problem. I bring this up because you can't do science without sharing information, and so, by censoring everyone's efforts at sharing information on the topic of COVID-19, we - specifically, Mark Zuckerberg and that crowd of wannabe know-it-alls - have actually made it difficult or impossible to do science, to take a scientific approach. How can people of a scientific inclination, do science, when the information is all being blocked off? Know-it-alls, busy-bodies, authoritarians, politicians and lawyers are a threat to public health when they storm the stage and grab the microphone from the doctors and scientists. That is why we are where we are today - because politicians and lawyers and entitled dot-com morons crowded the medical professionals out of the way and took over. I'm a regular platelet donor. All of the nurses have been vaccinated. We talk about this, sometimes, during the donations. They are fearful for the future. I am fearful of their shedding viral material while I am donating. We are both wondering what will happen to blood banks if nurses start dying, and wondering if inoculating doctors and nurses first is always a good idea, seeing as it is an experimental vaccine - that's a good way to kill off 95% of your doctors and nurses, and then, where are you? Dying like flies, that's where. I hope we all learn something from this. Those of us that survive, that is. Whenever I think of blood clots, I'm just naturally reminded of Judge Christopher Wilson, and JV160250.