Covid enthusiasts resorting to ad hominem....

News

San Francisco CA

Description

We get it that you are feeling angry and confused these days in light of having been played by the fake pandemic for nearly a solid year and a half. You don't know of a single healthy person ANYWHERE that "died of covid" and you're terrified to even begin to allow yourself to realize that the homeless population throughout Western Civilization have not been affected by it. We get it that these facts shoot massive holes into the entire bullshit story that you've been conditioned to believe of covid being "super contagious and lethal", but that doesn't change the truth of the matter whatsoever. Try to get over your fragile, delicate ego for long enough to allow you to begin to look at the reality of the situation... you can only benefit from it and have nothing to lose. ANYBODY that lives in or travels through the city areas can see the exact same homeless people that have been there since well before the pandemic began. If you do not live in these areas, just ask someone who does and they will confirm the same thing. And, it's not just in the SF Bay Area; it's LA, NYC, New Orleans, Denver, Chicago, England, and so on. This is a very important observation that people are terrified of discussing (God only knows why). The media will not touch it with a ten foot pole, along with the fact that if you have already had covid then you have antibodies and the "vaccine" will be of no benefit to you. Why are these truths being concealed and anybody mentioning them being outright attacked when they are there for anybody to see with their own eyes? Denying the truth doesn't change the facts! If you don't have evidence to suggest or prove otherwise, then don't waste your time responding with baseless ad hominem attacks that contribute nothing whatsoever to our generating awareness to these important topics. Ad hominem, Latin for “to the man”, is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making it rather than the argument itself. It is another informal logical fallacy. The logical structure of an ad hominem is as follows: Person A makes a claim X. Person B attacks person A. Therefore, X is wrong. When you see the logical structure of the argument it becomes clear why it’s a fallacy. The truth or falsehood of X has nothing to do with the person arguing in support of it. Imagine if X had been written down and you didn’t know who was arguing the case. If you couldn’t prove it wrong with arguments, then you can’t prove it wrong at all. Don't be a Loser! Listen to Socrates. “When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

By:  view source

Discussion

By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

/
Search this area