Description
I've written about the "Laws" that are passed by the state
legislature and how most of these laws are really written for the
benefit of the Legal profession. I've got negative feedback.
So let me point out a couple of situations, now they came from
the old TV series (Dragnet) which was written from LAPS
case files.
1. A man is driving Drunk and while speeding hits two
pedestrians and "murders" them. He was tried and although
found guilty, let off with a lesser punishment.
Later the same person, again while driving drunk hit a car
and murdering two teenagers. Fortunately, the accident
also caused him to lose both legs, I say fortunately because
he could no longer drive, except that with the aid of mechanical
gadgets he could drive. For once a Judge did the right thing
and terminally took his drivers license. Four people dead
there is to more to this story, but I've covered the major point.
It is not a "Right" to drive a car, which seems to be the case
today. And I know that if you drink there might be a time when
you dive when you should not, but murdering someone with
a car is not something that should be forgiven(period)....
Case 2:
Two men who are robbers, and use a shotgun during the
robberies, are finally caught, after shooting a police officer
in the stomach with both barrels.. The Policeman lived
the two robbers stood trial and were found guilty of attempted
murder sentence was (not less the 1 year or more then 14
14 years) They then stood trial for three robber's and were
found guilty. The sentence is for each crime was ( not less
then 5 years or more then 15 years for each count)
If you see, shooting the officer was deemed less sever as
robbing people.
To me if a person leaves a home, goes out to rob someone
and uses a gun to commit a crime, it should be a 5 years
sentence (period) Then the crime should be prosecuted
Politicians make "Laws" with loopholes to further the Legal
profession (period).
Discussion
By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.