re: re: What's to fear?

Troy MI

Description

"I’m tired of hearing people say there was no fraud. It happened, it’s real, and people better get wise fast" - That's a quote from the CEO of Cyber Ninjas. Imagine, for a moment, that someone who said "There was definitely no fraud" wanted to spearhead the audit. You'd have a problem with that, no? Not a rhetorical question, it deserves a direct answer. That's the problem with the audit from those that oppose it. It's that simple. You've put someone in charge who already decided the result before even looking at the ballots. Option 1: Put yourself in someone's shoes to see what their motivation is Option 2: Dehumanize them and fall down the conspiracy rabbit hole. Choosing option 1 is a simple task, but I guess you can only do it if you want to do it. So what if Cyber Ninjas find no fraud? Will that just prove that Cyber Ninjas was in on the fraud too? Hahaha! We've also been down this road before the 2020 election. Have you heard of the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF?) A conservative group that published lists of "dead and illegal voters" and then got sued by the very voters on their list who were in fact not dead or "illegal"! Another quote: " "PILF recognizes that individuals in [the removed exhibits] were in fact citizens and that these citizens did not commit felonies. PILF profoundly regrets any characterization of those registrants as felons or instances of registration or voting as felonies." I lack trust too. I don't trust conservative backed groups to not just make Sh!t up, as PILF did (and admitted to!) in 2016/17. Again, put yourself in my shoes. I'd understand if you didn't want a biased actor towards not finding fraud to conduct the audit, but you expect me to be ok with vice versa?