re: Say what

Troy MI

Description

Funny observation. Google is the most robust search engine at this point in time. So for the point of argument, say Microsoft does the audit. And I won't even ask you to "bing" anything. 🤣 You still seem to be dodging. You answered my question with "you really care who does the audit?" I take it you don't care at all who does the audit then? Might as well put Microsoft on it, then. Yes, I am curious about your answer - but my main objective is to get you to think about the situation from a perspective other than your own. You may not think the democrats deserve to have a say in this, but surely you can understand that there's an angle to this that does not involve conspiracy theories. I never flag anyone here unless their post is very blatantly racist or obscene. I do not believe I've ever flagged any of your posts. Even then, I do not have any autoflagging software, so others would have to agree with me to take the post down. To answer your question, I don't care at all about Jenner's gubernatorial campaign. There's a limit to how closely I'm willing to follow politics. My goal is to be pro-objective-reasoning, that's why I chose to bite on the audit issue specifically. The audit is a data-based investigation that has a definite answer (assuming it has been done properly). It's has the potential to become "facts that we can all agree on" and I think that is big. But if they blow it, then that sucks for this country. I do not think having an investigation that is not impartial, or does not retain enough evidence to be independently verified, helps you, me or anyone. My personal hope (which may not even be in line with the liberal lawyers you complained about) is that the audit moves forward but with checks and balances that make biased/incorrect findings impossible.