We did try to fire Trump twice.

Las Vegas NV

Description

We did try to fire Trump twice. The problem was he has too many friends in the senate to get rid of him. It is called IMPEACHMENT. He had impeachment charges brought against him twice. He was not impeached due to the senate not voting enough YES votes. Do you know just what the word "impeach" really means? Most people think that it just means to have charges brought against the President. What it really mean is to be actually thrown out of office, not just have charges brought against the President. No U.S. President has ever been impeached or thrown out of office. The first President to have impeachment charges brought against him was James Buchanan. He was found not guilty. So he was not impeached. The second President to have impeachment charges brought against him was Andrew Johnson (just after Lincoln was President). He was found not guilty. So, he was not impeached. I read the first line of the above email I received from… Immediately I realized I had another ignorant dem/lib regurgitating false reality, and read no more of the email. It was based on a few backward claims. This is my response: No, we did not. You, democrats and liberals tried and failed. Too bad. I have written and published over 600 articles. Do you honestly think I have not studied impeachment? Are you that ignorant? Do you know the difference between democracy and republic, and why the founding fathers hated and rejected democracy? Have you ever thought to read something to know why they did what they did? Are you that ignorant and presumptuous in ignorance? I am certain, judging by your lack of a grasp on reality, that you would claim the dementocrats paraded scores of "witnesses" to impeach President Trump, but you are so mentally challenged you did not have the brain capacity to determine what a witness is, or even to think it might be good to have a bit of a personal understanding of it.. How stupid, like other dumbocrats. Honestly, if I set aside the insults to your ignorance, would you care o know the difference between a rumor, hearsay and witness? If not, then you must realize you are rejecting science, political science and reality. You are your own worst enemy, giving yourself nothing to aid you in this "debate". I am also certain, judging by your obvious hatred for anything republican (honest), that you will just dive deeper into ignorant hate, and learn absolutely nothing. Before you get back to me with more stupidity, do some research and tell me why it was a mistake the founding fathers made in choosing a Constitutional Republic, and then find a democracy that has a Bill of Rights that no man can assail, like ours, as found in the republican model. Reread my letter to yourself and be honest with yourself, in spite of your institutionalized dem/lib dishonesty (lying about rumor "witnesses" is dishonest). Ask yourself if my words are not congruent, lucid, and of a relatively good vocabulary. I will give you one clue. The dementocrats did not present one single witness to impeach, and if you will reject the science of etymology and language, then you go ahead, remain ignorant and exploited. The dementocrats presented hearsay and rumor. That is all. Go to court, find a trial in which they have witnesses. There is a reason a witness must personally witness something. Can you expand your simpleton’s intelligence to that normal, average brain-power level of reason?. So, quit being dumb....and learn, or don't bother me anymore.