re:Reasons why Trump taxes being released would be a problem for hi

Oakland CA

Description

Biden, Harris, Schumer. Pelosi, Oh wait! my bad I thought you said their were no liars in politics. Based on past performance, what you think and know could fit on a thimble, you're one of the few consistently wrong people posting, not even being as right as a broken clock is twice a day. Trump didn't have an FBI, he unlike Democrats doesn't think the Federal government agencies are his personal possessons, the DOJ found that Obama allowed unfettered spying on Trump and his campaign using falsified information to get FISA search warrants. Obama did the spying not because Trump was running against him but because Hillary would continue his socialist move to the Left and Trump wouldn't, you know "Home Team" advantage. Anyone like yourself so dense not to understand this shouldn't be embarrassing themselves so openly but as we've all found out about you, you don't particularly care what thought comes out of your twisted little head, how wrong it is our how embarrassed it makes you look which often is the case for Democrats like you. Showing one's taxes is a poor barometer as to how one is virtuous enough to be elected, its in fact a meaningless virtue signal no matter how long it's been done. Trump not showing his tax returns had little to do with how amazingly effective he was as our President. Wow are you clueless, seems information goes through you as fast as crap through a goose. As president, Bill Clinton essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the U.S. had by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the People’s Republic of China. That “administration’s voluntary release of all the secrets of America’s nuclear tests, combined with the systematic theft of the secrets that were left as a result of its lax security controls, effectively wiped out America’s technological edge. Unlike the administrations that preceded it, the Clinton administration accepted millions of dollars from the military and intelligence services of at least one hostile foreign power. All of this was done in exchange for illegal campaign contributions from a massive totalitarian country determined to eclipse the U.S. as a world superpower. President Clinton also lifted security controls, allowing thieves to access other vital military technologies, while disarming his own side and opposing needed defenses. “One of the key technological breaks China received, without having to spy to get it, was the deliverance of supercomputers once banned from export for security reasons,” writes Horowitz. “Supercomputers underpin the technology of nuclear and missile warfare, and not only for firing and controlling the missiles. A supercomputer can simulate a nuclear test and is thus crucial to the development of nuclear warheads. But, according to a Washington Post editorial: ‘In the first three quarters of 1998 nine times as many supercomputers were exported to China as during the previous seven years.’” This transfer was authorized three years after the spy thefts were detected. What rationale—besides stupidity, greed, or some other equally indefensible motive—could justify this? What responsible president or administration official, at any relevant level in any government, would allow the massive transfer of national-security assets like these to a dictatorship they knew had stolen their country’s most highly guarded military secrets? Back in the 1990s, as longtime Clinton bagman Terry McAuliffe, now governor of Virginia, set records raising money for the Clintons. In that era congressional investigators unearthed an elaborate Communist Chinese money-laundering scheme. Under it money was funneled to the Clinton organization through businesspeople, including Yah Lin “Charlie” Trie. In that case, 94 individuals either refused questioning, pled the Fifth Amendment, or fled the country. Trie accepted a plea bargain with federal prosecutors in 1999 in exchange for providing information about questionable campaign contributions from China. McAuliffe helped a company called Loral Space get seats on official trade missions. He reportedly convinced the Clinton administration to overrule national security officials in order win approval for a Loral deal that gave Red China critical missile technology. Loral’s chief executive officer became the Democratic National Committee’s largest donor and McAuliffe became DNC chairman. According to a Wall Street Journal account from Clinton days, a bipartisan congressional inquiry “found Beijing has stolen U.S. design data for nearly all elements needed for a major nuclear attack on the U.S., such as advanced warheads, missiles, and guidance systems. Targets of the spying ranged from an Army anti-tank weapon to nearly all modern fighter jets. Most wasn’t done by professionals, but by visitors or front companies. Lax security by the Clinton Administration is blamed in part, and satellite makers Hughes and Loral are criticized.” China’s theft of American technology gave it a 20-year head start in developing its own nuclear warhead delivery system. Hughes and Loral, large contributors to Clinton’s campaign coffers, gave the Chinese technology to deliver nuclear payloads. “They were able to accomplish this with indispensable assistance provided by the Clinton White House that allowed them to circumvent technology controls instituted for national-security purposes by previous administrations,” writes Horowitz. Then-Rep. Curt Weldon (R-Pa.), who was chairman of the National Security subcommittee on military research and development and is fluent in the Russian language, characterized the six years of Clinton’s administration that had thus far elapsed as “the worst period in our history in terms of undermining our national security.” When Weldon visited Russia with 10 other congressmen a Russian general threatened them, saying that if the U.S. deployed ground troops to Kosovo, Russia could throw America into chaos by detonating a nuclear device in the sky near the eastern seaboard that would destroy every computer chip in the country, disabling telephones, airplanes, and electrical grids. Such are the fruits of appeasement. Incessant propaganda from the Left during the recent campaign and the post-election period, has stressed President-elect Donald Trump’s connections to Russia while downplaying or ignoring altogether the Clintons’ relationship with the Kremlin. The connections of Trump, his family, his campaign staff, transition team, and would-be cabinet members to Russia have been microscopically examined and hyped daily in the news and Democrats. After the brutal shellacking Democrats got at the polls Nov. 8, 2016 no wonder they’re doing so much saber-rattling against Russia. They need an external villain to prevent their own grassroots from rising up against them. The virus during Obama's Presidency wasn't nearly as deadly and Obama's own point man in charge said they dodged a bullet, Sixty four million were infected. Trump didn't have a thriving economy when he took office either, in fact when he became President, Obama passed along the worst recovery from a recession since WWII, the recession was over five month into Obama's Presidency and the next seven and half years we suffered through all Obama's negative growth policies for our economy. Our economy was growing at a snails pace when Obama left office, in fact it grew at a snails pace when he was in office too! Every time someone alleges someone else being paid to post here it's an admission they've lost the argument, every time. Just the usual ad hominem attack when you can't counter. I find it hard to believe you are completely unaware of the missile technology transferred to China with the nod and wink under Clinton, truly amazing. There's no crying in politics! Oh wait, John Boehner, Ted Cruz, yup there are cryers. On the orange orangutang running, let him. I doubt he'll be in good enough health to run but let him. I also know the "base" he and the GOP thinks he has is no where near as big as they think. And if he starts his own party, it has no chance of doing anything other than taking votes from Republicans. But it will allow him to continue to solicit donations from the mentally challenged. As for the spying shit, that's what it is - shit. Debunked by Trump's own FBI. It's funny how it's Obama who was spying. What the fuck for? He was leaving office, didn't necessarily care for Hillary, and so what was his motivation? If you said Hillary, then I might believe you. As for his taxes, as I've stated before he was the one saying he'd show them. Never did. Do I care. Nope. If he's convicted will he go to jail? No. Do I care. No. The only point I tried to make was that HE was the one who said he'd show them. On the guidance systems, *if* your statement is true (I don't recall the US selling China any kind of weapons systems) I guarantee it didn't include the software. It's the same with our airplanes that are sold. We take out the weapons, avionics, etc. systems and sell them a shell. And on your statement that Trump did far less damage to America than Obama has just shown us either what an extremist POV you have, or you're an idiot. Let's review just some of the "non-damage": 1. Did 500K people die from virus that Obama ignored, downplayed, and politicized? Ummmmmm......NO. 2. Did Obama have a thriving economy to start his presidency? Ummmmmmm....NO. 2A. Was it growing when he left? Ummmmmm......YES. 3. Did Obama call the Sec of State of Georgia and ask them to find more votes after the 2016 election? Ummmmmmm........NO. 4. Did Obama incite a crowd of people to march to the capitol and stop the electoral count? Ummmm (say it with me now) UMMMMMM........NO. And that's just for starters. I can't even fathom how anyone can say anything like that after what we have witnessed. Hope you get paid to post that shit.