Re:Reasons why Trump taxes being released would be a problem for him

News

Fairfax CA

Description

Ya know you're correct. There is no law that says a sitting president has to release his returns. All of the previous presidents did it in good faith to show Americans they pay their fair share. The difference with Trump is that HE said he'd release them. He mentioned it at every rally, every interview. He never did. As for the investigation, I would bet it's politically motivated. Most are. Trump did himself no favors during the early stages of the pandemic with the way he spoke of NY. To the other posters comment about it not mattering who started the process, he's right. In this case they would have listened to the claims with a cynical eye considering who's telling the tale. But if anything that was claimed was verifiable, investigators might then take up the case depending who it is. In this case, Donald obviously pissed off Cuomo. On the smell test comments, it's Trump who stinks to high heaven. Not only has he been a waste of taxpayer money, he's not even a decent human being. He's a spoiled rich kid who can't understand when he doesn't get his way. Hence his post-election behavior. He used to be president, today, he's just another used car salesman. Re:Reasons why Trump taxes being released would be a problem for him ( (san jose south) © craigslist - Map data © OpenStreetMap You're overlooking something, it hasn't been discovered or even proven Trump illegally evaded taxes it's been alleged and if you don't know the difference you have nothing to offer this conversation. Do you really need reminding Mueller offered no evidence Trump committed a crime in fact he didn't even recommend Trump should face an impeachment trial. This after 3 years of people like you saying "everyone knows he's guilty of colluding with the Russians. The same goes for his 2 impeachments. Oh you knew you had him dead to rights, he was guilty except the jury said not guilty. So what do you do in the face of all this, blame the jury, how convenient they're to blame not the unsubstantiated charges. Why is this crime different than all the other alleged crimes, it's not based on any evidence it's based on a convicted felon trying to save his own skin. He got 3 years in prison and now has house arrest, you think Michael Cohen is a dirty rotten bastard but you're willing to forgive him if he can get Trump convicted. No big deal he is living in his luxurious home not a prison cell. The reason Mueller turned over to Vance the Cohen trial unlike all the others he prosecuted was to go after Trump. Mueller could have done the same as Vance but #1 he didn't think he had the time and #2 he was laying a booby trap for a civil case. Totally unethical not that you care but never the less. Trump was fighting not to turn over his tax returns for the same reason people don't have to testify at their own trial, let the prosecution do the work. People don't have to drop their shorts because you want them to, your reasoning is unsophisticated and juvenile and ignores the law. If the prosecutors claim this was a multi year on going case they could easily provide the public with records of it which they haven't so I don't particularly trust their word. The only mention of him being investigated for tax fraud that I can find was a NY Times article making allegations and the Times isn't known for their accuracy particularly when it comes to Trump since they all but convicted him in print of collusion and impeachment charges all that failed miserably. You have no evidence of your allegations, you say them as if they're proven but they're not, in fact I allege you are one of millions of Democrats suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and will always have some crime to allege against him. You've been trained like a seal to bark when his name is mentioned the only question is what's the treat they give you afterwards. Just like the other poster you offer no proof only opinion and because you're angry you demand everyone accepts it. There is no probable cause in this case, it's a witch hunt a fishing expedition. you were wrong the 3 times before you'll be wrong this time too, you just won't ever admit it. You'll ultimately blame the prosecutor for not doing his job or the jury. Prosecutors have no legal right to persecute people they don't like and neither do you. If you want to convict a President go after Quid Pro Quo Joe who admitted in a tape interview he extorted the Ukrainian President to fire his chief prosector or Joe would personally see to it Ukraine didn't get the billion dollars in foreign aid to fight the Russians. The RUSSIANS sir, the nasty RUSSIANS you hate almost as much as Trump! The Ukraine is one of the most corrupt nations in the world, lots of officials are corrupt there so why was the one investigating a company that paid Hunter millions over the years the only one Biden want fired? I remain unimpressed with your argument because it fails the smell test. I remain unimpressed with you for the same reason. Just say'n

By:  view source

Discussion

By posting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

/
Search this area