Re: Re Re: Election Fraud

Augusta ME

Description

First off, I'm not a Democrat, so there's no party line to recite. And I never said anything even remotely like "He should be banned from ever speaking again." But at the same time, garbage doesn't deserve equal airtime with actual facts, either (regardless of how well it might be produced). Not every idea or voice is worthy of equal time and consideration; and by a similar token, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there's not one isn't considered free speech protected by the first amendment either. The argument is not circular. The assertion that "the major issue is that the states should not have certified" is false to begin with, there's no circle: it's not that the election is valid simply because they certified, it's that they *should* have certified, and that they did certify is *not* the major issue, because, from the outset, despite numerous allegations (many of which were being alleged before there was even an election to allege anything about, lol 🤪) there was, and *still* is, no evidence of fraud or irregularities that substantially affected or would have changed the outcome. *That's why they certified*. Get it? lol We need some italics here. That's why they certified. And, that idea was additionally tested in multiple courts, in multiple states, and not a single time did the assertion they should not have certified stand up to critical examination. Likewise, there are also not "numerous issues" with how the states changed the rules. Each state is entitled to set its own rules, the feds don't do that. And most changes I'm aware of made it easier for people to vote, without making it easier to commit fraud. You have a problem with making it easier for people to vote? (I imagine you do, when the majority is against you, and so disenfranchising certain people works in your favor.) And, to boot, after the election was over, very little fraud was discovered, again, in multiple re-examinations and challenges, both legal and administrative. Anything else about the rules people don't like, or other technicalities that are potentially problematic even if they didn't create substantive problems, there's plenty of time to change before the next election. You say, "It's only disinformation if it's not true," but, by your own definition then, it's disinformation, because it's *not* true. Every conceivable reliable and authoritative source has weighed in on that, with the same conclusion. And the remaining idea that there's nonetheless some nationwide international conspiracy involving other countries, democrats and republicans across the country, our security agencies, the judiciary, etc etc, all working together to rig the election, is simply ludicrous. If that many people hate the guy and want him gone, why would you even need a conspiracy? There should be plenty enough people to just vote him out, no need to conspire about anything. 😄 And though you speak of the Biden Naziship, I don't see Biden doing anything to shut Lindell down, clearly it's there, for anyone who cares to waste their time by seeking it out. You found it, garbage almost always attracts a few believing flies.....